I would argue though that FCPx features are absolutely unique in the NLE market. If price is an issue, you can't beat Resolve right now. However, better interoperability between FCPX and Motion and/or Logic would go a long way towards abating the advantages of Resolve.Ībsolutely no reason to stick with FCPx, or any other NLE for that matter. The bottom line is that people who like to edit in FCPX, because of its unique qualities, won't jump to Resolve, as long as Apple continues its development efforts. However, you can use as much or as little as you're like. Right now, BMD is headed to making Resolve a good all-in-one tool, but few editors will truly master all aspects of it. Simply adding the same tools into FCPX won't make it a comparable grading tool, because the workflow and layout is different. Part of the beauty to its color page is the layout, not just the toolset. Resolve is a great color correction tool, but it is not the only one, nor even the best high-end grading tool.
Just because you have a powerful, low cost NLE doesn't mean the others no longer have a need in the market. Each of these appeal to their respective market segments and while they all share similarities, they also have unique features. Plus the lower tier: Rush, LumaFusion, and iMovie. The current market has 7 "pro" NLEs: FCPX, Premiere Pro, Media Composer, Resolve, Lightworks, Edius, and Vegas.
0 kommentar(er)
